The New Era of CEO Accountability: When Leadership Standards Meet Reality
- kirstyaldous
- Sep 4
- 5 min read
Overview
CEO turnover has reached unprecedented levels
CEOs are being held accountable for much more than just financial performance, with activist investors gaining distinct power in high-level decision-making
Proactive risk and reputation monitoring is no longer a luxury
The Modern CEO Challenge
Svea Herbst-Bayliss and Isla Binnie for Reuters detailed that in 2025, CEOs are exiting at the fastest rate since 2005, with at least 41 S&P 500 chief executives already having exited their roles this year (Reuters).
Even as the current political discourse often may be seen to reflect a more permissive attitude toward personal ethics, the corporate world continues to operate under a framework that demands rigor, accountability, and transparency. Corporate governance, with its checks and balances, remains a stabilising force designed to protect stakeholders, preserve trust, and guide corporations through turbulent climates. Boards of directors, regulatory bodies, and shareholders still expect clarity in decision-making, responsibility in leadership, and adherence to ethical standards that transcend political trends.
This is one of the environments we track at Polecat with our Responsible Business Intelligence® (RBI) Index, which enables proactive risk and reputation management. CEOs and board members can identify emerging risks, benchmark against industry peers, and make informed decisions about potential reputational threats before they become crises.
Want to learn more? Book A Demo
Beyond the Bottom Line: The Ethics Imperative
The recent high-profile departure of Nestlé's CEO paints a clear picture of the importance of CEO integrity for its board and shareholders. Laurent Freixe’s dismissal over an undisclosed relationship follows similar action taken at McDonald’s and BP.
These recent disclosures regarding CEO exits represent the ability of boards to be both fully transparent and willing to act decisively to protect shareholder value and organisational integrity.
Polecat data demonstrates Nestle's net sentiment score declining from +70 to -34 post the announcement on Laurent Freixe's departure. We also detected that much of the negativity was towards personal ethics rather than wider governance concerns. Nestlé's swift action to appoint a new CEO and assurance to continue effective corporate governance through its effective whistleblowing platform has resulted in subsequent media attention returning to the company tackling continued market pressure.
The event illustrates that reputation must be - and increasingly is - considered in board decisions. As we explored in our previous edition, ‘Risk in the Age of Culture Wars’, factoring for reputational risk is essential in modern business strategy.
As our own CEO, James Lawn, expressed in our Whitepaper What Just Happened: A C-Suite Guide to Uncertainty, Volatility and Opportunity in 2025, ‘Business leaders today face a barrage of rapid, overlapping disruptions - geopolitical conflicts, cultural backlashes that impact employer brands, economic shocks, technological upheavals - that are overwhelming traditional decision-making models’.
Our data highlights that these risk dimensions don't operate in isolation – they form an interconnected web of accountability pressures.
The orange zones highlight areas of negative sentiment, with notable concern in leadership development, executive misconduct, and board appointments.
Scan your horizon: Book A Demo
The Perfect Storm of Expectations
What's driving this shift? Several forces are converging to create unprecedented pressure on CEO performance:
The Activist Investor Reality: A report released by The Conference Board revealed that 42% of S&P 500 companies that changed leaders last year were performing in the bottom quartile for shareholder returns. (The Conference Board) Activist investors like those at OpenDoor, where CEO Carrie Wheeler recently stepped down after apparent pressure from activist investors, are increasingly comfortable with pushing for and utilising leadership transitions (CNBC). Leadership development, executive misconduct, and board appointments, as highlighted by Polecat’s data, are the precise arenas where activists tend to focus their campaigns.
We can look to PepsiCo, whose recent investor Elliott Management are pushing for a ‘strategic overhaul’, to see the growing strength of such investors (Foodbev Media).
Zero Tolerance for Misconduct: Rachel Arnow-Richman, James Hicks, and Steven Davidoff Solomon illuminate how the #MeToo era fundamentally changed how boards approach personal conduct issues (Indiana Law Journal). What might have been overlooked or quietly managed in previous decades now results in swift departures.
The Political Minefield: CEOs are now navigating an increasingly polarised political environment that poses a risk to their company and their career - caught between employee expectations, consumer sentiment, and shareholder interests in ways that previous generations of leaders never experienced.
The Reputation Risk Reality: The recent viral event concerning Astronomer’s previous CEO Andy Byron is a surprisingly apt metaphor for how CEOs, like celebrities, can be caught in the spotlight. The recent resignation of Suntory's CEO over a police investigation into THC supplements underscores how reputational risks can emerge from unexpected quarters and demand immediate response.
IKEA's planned succession from Jesper Brodin to Juvencio Maeztu, highlights the truth in this. The careful handling of this positive leadership transition further highlights the importance of careful succession planning and the maintenance of organisational stability.
Want to see which topics are driving conversation in your industry? Book A Demo
What This Means for Business Leaders
The message is clear: accountability standards for CEOs have permanently shifted. Success now requires not just financial acumen, but ethical leadership, cultural awareness, and the ability to navigate complex stakeholder expectations. Boards are more empowered, investors more demanding, and consumers more vocal than ever before.
Want to learn which stakeholders are driving conversation around the topics and companies you care about? Book A Demo
The leaders who thrive will be those who understand that true accountability means being answerable not just for what happens on their watch, but for how they conduct themselves every step of the way.
The Solution: Proactive Risk Intelligence
This is where comprehensive reputation monitoring becomes essential. The Polecat Responsible Business Intelligence® (RBI) Index addresses exactly this challenge by providing CEOs and their teams with early warning systems.
How the RBI Index Works:
Analyses reputation and risk conversations across 17,000+ companies
Measures the proportion of "Unhealthy" versus "Neutral" and "Healthy" coverage
Utilises Impact Scores that consider source importance and topic relevance
Provides fully auditable results down to individual posting level
Covers both traditional media and social media with appropriate weighting
Why This Matters Now: Unlike traditional monitoring that often catches issues after they've escalated, the RBI Index enables proactive reputation management so that businesses can stay ahead of emerging risks, respond strategically to reputational challenges, and maintain competitive advantage.
Comments